The fallibility of psychological tests
Psychological testing has become rampant in all industries, even more so in
the case of Information Technology companies, BPOs and ITES. Thesis
The tests are used to ‘cast’ profiles of personality and competence.
descriptions that would help companies hire the “right” candidate.
The Human Resources department of most organizations is responsible for
the administration of psychometric tests.
The international body that establishes the guidelines for testing is the
International Testing Commission (ITC) which provides guidelines for
adaptation and use of tests. ITC has published guidelines to cover the
following –
Professional and ethical standards in testing
Rights of the candidate to the test and other parties involved in the test.
process
Choice and evaluation of alternative tests
Administration, scoring and interpretation test
Drafting of reports and comments.
ITC has defined test use proficiency as “A competent test user
use the evidence appropriately, professionally and ethically,
paying due attention to the needs and rights of those who participate in the
testing process, the reasons for testing, and the broader context in
in which the tests are performed “.
There are many reasons why a test can be fallible:
1. Inappropriate use of tests
The standards for which the tests are designed must be observed.
carefully. They cannot be administered to a population that is
different from the normal population (the normal population, for example, might
be, teenagers, senior executives; norms may be based on age,
occupation, gender, economic situation, etc. ). That is, a test designed
for teenagers cannot be administered to senior executives and vice
and vice versa because the results of said administration would be wrong.
2. Cultural fair tests
Another common flaw is the use of tests that are not culturally fair.
Many psychological tests have been designed for the western population.
and it can be used appropriately only in that culture. Unfortunately many
of these tests are used in the Indian population leading to errors
conclusions.
3. Test design
The psychological test can only be designed by qualified professionals
in psychometrics. Laypeople often design tests with the help of
information accessed through the Internet or sometimes even from your
own common sense. Such tests are not valid.
4. Test validation
Every test that has been designed must be validated. The process of
validation would involve administering the test in a large population
for a period of time before it is certified as ‘ready to use’. This
it cannot be made from tests that are manufactured overnight.
5. Downloaded tests
Tests are often downloaded from the Internet and used for
other than what they were designed for. For example, a
personality test used to assess emotional or computer intelligence
Skills of a person.
6. Incorrect customization
Sometimes the elements of a test are changed to suit the user. Such
cases where the test cannot give valid results. For example, an item (a
question / statement in test) would say:
“Do you usually date on the weekends?” , could be changed to
“Do you socialize on the weekends?”
to suit the Indian scene. The test results with such changes
‘articles’ will not be valid.
7. Test administration
The administration of the test should be systematically standardized, that is, the
The test must be administered under exactly the same conditions to all
users. This means that the actual test environment, instructions,
time and materials are the same on each test occasion.
Before administering the test, the user should consider the following
guidelines –
o What is the purpose of the tests?
o What results will be achieved through the tests?
o Why are these specific tests used?
o Why are these tests relevant to the desired results?
o What evidence is there that these tests are appropriate for people
Who will be evaluated?
8. Confidentiality of test results
All test results must be kept by the administrator strictly
confidence. Revealing the results could lead to unfair discrimination
in the workplace. This happens when a test used for selection is
disadvantageous for certain ‘groups’ within the organization. In the USA,
The use of IQ tests in employee selection is prohibited. This was
due to lack of confidentiality maintained by administrators
which resulted in unfair discrimination of employees. In the present
Any psychometric test should be administered with great care and after
the necessary permits are obtained.
To ensure confidentiality, the following guidelines should be
considered:
1. Make sure test materials are stored safely
2. Ensure safe storage and control access to test materials.
3. Respect copyright law and agreements that exist regarding
evidence, including prohibitions on the copying or transmission of
materials in electronic or other form to others, whether
qualified or not.
4. Protect the integrity of the test by failing to advise individuals on
actual test materials or other practice materials that could unfairly
influence your test performance.
5. Make sure testing techniques are not publicly described in such a way
that its usefulness suffers.
9. Competence of the administrator and interpreter of the test
The personnel administering the tests must be strict in following up
instructions stipulated by test designers. The interpretations too
It must be carried out by qualified personnel who are psychologists.
10. Limitation of evidence
The tests are ‘limited’ for the purposes for which they have been
designed. For a holistic assessment of an individual, it requires
that the test results are supplemented with information from interviews
and group discussions. Also, the test results are invalid after
eighteen months of his administration.
11. Proof of copyright
It is a crime to copy copyrighted evidence. They can only
be used after obtaining the necessary permission from the designers.
Otherwise, this illegal copying may lead to a lack of standardization in
Test conditions and poor control of materials.
12. Feedback test
Users often do not follow the guidelines for feedback.
The British Psychological Society has established the following guidelines
for written and oral comments:
o Ensure that the technical and linguistic levels of any report
appropriate to the level of understanding of the recipients.
o Clarify that the test data represents only one source of information
and should always be considered in conjunction with other information.
o Explain how the importance of the test results should be weighed in
relationship with other information about the people evaluated.
o Use a form and structure for a report that is appropriate for the
context of the assessment.
o Where appropriate, provide third parties with information on how
the results can be used to inform your decisions.
o Explain and support the use of test results that are used to classify people.
into categories (for example, for diagnostic purposes or for job selection).
o Include in written reports a clear summary and, where relevant,
specific recommendations.
o Present oral comments to examinees in a constructive and supportive manner.
conduct.